Skip to main content

Address of the President of Russia on February 21 and issues of the nuclear agreement

    Address of the President of Russia on February 21 and                            issues of the nuclear agreement


 Nika Chitadze.

Professor of the International Black Sea University.

Director of the Center for International Studies

President of the George C. Marshall Alumni Union, Georgia - International and Security Research Center  



In the February 21 address of Russian President Putin to the Federal Assembly, which was specially timed to coincide with the approach of the anniversary of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, as expected, only distortion of facts and complete lies prevailed.

 

However, Putin still touched on one of the world's most pressing issues - the strategic nuclear arms control mechanism - when he announced that Russia was suspending its participation in the Treaty on the "Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms", which the Russians refer to as Limitation of Strategic Offensive Weapons - III, and the Americans - as New START.

 

This agreement between the two nuclear states, the USA and the Russian Federation, was signed in Prague on April 8, 2010, and was signed by the then Presidents of the USA and Russia, Barack Obama, and Dmitry Medvedev.

 

We can say with full responsibility that, first of all, to reduce and control the strategic nuclear weapons with Russia, then President Obama started with the Kremlin the Reset policy because the US president hoped that by warming relations with Russia, along with solving the nuclear problem, the West would be able to solve the situation in Afghanistan, Iran's nuclear program, the creation of an anti-missile shield in Europe, and other global problems.


And 13 years later, Putin is going to play the same card - due to Washington's military assistance to Ukraine, Russia is suspending its participation in this treaty, taking into account the consequences.

 It can be considered, what this "nuclear deal" between the US and Russia represents, which, as the Kremlin suggests, may give serious thought to the White House and the West.

 

Since 1972, this was the seventh treaty that defined the parity of American and Soviet/Russian strategic nuclear weapons and thereby regulated the nuclear confrontation between the two states, as it provided for mutual inspections of strategic facilities, which almost eliminated the secret, combat-ready deployment of uncountable strategic nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles.

By the way, this agreement, which was concluded for 10 years, expired in 2021, but then President Putin himself signed an extension of this agreement for another five years, until February 2026.

 

This treaty stipulates that the United States and the Russian Federation may have in combat readiness (each side) no more than 700 intercontinental ballistic missiles, submarine-launched ballistic missiles, and heavy bombers capable of carrying no more than 1,550 nuclear warheads, as well as combat-ready and no more than 800 missile launchers.

 

This arrangement worked, in principle, because as of September 1, 2020, the US arsenal included 675 strategic nuclear warhead carriers, 1,457 nuclear warheads, and 800 combat-ready and inactive launchers.

 

According to the data of the same year 2020, the strategic nuclear arsenal of the Russian Federation looked like this - 510 units of strategic nuclear warhead carriers, 1,447 nuclear warheads, and 764 combat-ready and non-combat launchers.

 

Russia's announcement of a moratorium on participation in this agreement means that mutual inspections will be stopped and the control mechanism will be completely disrupted. By the way, Putin's regime has already taken some action when it tested an intercontinental ballistic missile. The name of the said missile is SARMAT, which is called Satan II in the West.

 

Based on the above-mentioned factors, it can be said that nuclear militarization may begin at a new increasing pace.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Probability of Nuclear Weapons’ Disarmament from the Perspective of the Great Powers

  Probability of Nuclear Weapons’ Disarmament from the Perspective of the Great Powers By: Sofi Beridze Nika Chitadze Abstract   The article elaborates upon and analyzes the notion of nuclear weapons non-proliferation and clarifies its importance. Nevertheless, we demonstrate that total nuclear disarmament in contemporary competitive international politics is almost unattainable due to various factors. Initially, some countries that possess nuclear weapons strive to preserve their dominant position in the international arena, that’s why complete disarmament is impossible, and leading powers utilize them for their self-defense. Therefore, it’s out of the question to abandon ownership of them. The paper seeks to demonstrate the importance of “hard power” (regarding nuclear weapons) as a main tool for great powers to preserve preference. We mean maintaining power and primacy as much as they can, compared to other countries. In this article, it is determined whether nuclea...

Will Putin be able to persuade Lukashenko to directly involve the Belarusian army in the war with Ukraine?

  Will Putin be able to persuade Lukashenko to directly involve the Belarusian army in the war with Ukraine?   By: Nika Chitadze Professor of the International Black Sea University        Director of the Center for International Studies  President of the George C. Marshall Alumni Union, Georgia - International and Security Research Center   As is known, Russian President Putin flew to Minsk on December 19 with his "landing" - Minister of Defense Shoigu and Minister of Foreign Affairs Lavrov, and held very serious talks with his Belarusian counterpart Lukashenko, which could greatly influence the course of the Russian-Ukrainian war in the next two to three months.  The details of Putin's visit to the capital of Belarus were shrouded in secrecy - motorcades of Russian and US presidents usually use two identical armored limousines, which constantly change places in the motorcade to make it difficult for potential attackers of that parti...

АРЕСТ ПУТИНА – МИФ, КОТОРЫЙ МОЖЕТ СТАТЬ РЕАЛЬНОСТЬЮ?

  АРЕСТ ПУТИНА – МИФ, КОТОРЫЙ МОЖЕТ СТАТЬ РЕАЛЬНОСТЬЮ? Как стало известно, 3 сентября запланирован визит российского лидера в Улан-Батор, где он должен принять участие в торжественных мероприятиях по случаю 85-летия совместной победы СССР и Монголии над японскими войсками на реке Халхин-Гол. Также запланирована официальная встреча с президентом Хурэлсухом. Визит Путина в Монголию в Кремле не вызывает «переживаний», несмотря на наличие ордера на его арест, который, по утверждению Международного уголовного суда (МУС) , Улан-Батор обязан выполнить. Примечательно, что Монголия станет первым государством, признающим юрисдикцию МУС, куда Путин намеревается поехать после начала полномасштабного вторжения в Украину. В конце лета 2023 года он отказался от поездки в ЮАР, которая также является страной-подписантом Римского статута. Вместо него тогда в Йоханнесбург, на саммит БРИКС, отправился глава МИД Лавров, а сам же Путин выступил лишь по видеосвязи. Напомним, что 17 марта ...