Skip to main content

Address of the President of Russia on February 21 and issues of the nuclear agreement

    Address of the President of Russia on February 21 and                            issues of the nuclear agreement


 Nika Chitadze.

Professor of the International Black Sea University.

Director of the Center for International Studies

President of the George C. Marshall Alumni Union, Georgia - International and Security Research Center  



In the February 21 address of Russian President Putin to the Federal Assembly, which was specially timed to coincide with the approach of the anniversary of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, as expected, only distortion of facts and complete lies prevailed.

 

However, Putin still touched on one of the world's most pressing issues - the strategic nuclear arms control mechanism - when he announced that Russia was suspending its participation in the Treaty on the "Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms", which the Russians refer to as Limitation of Strategic Offensive Weapons - III, and the Americans - as New START.

 

This agreement between the two nuclear states, the USA and the Russian Federation, was signed in Prague on April 8, 2010, and was signed by the then Presidents of the USA and Russia, Barack Obama, and Dmitry Medvedev.

 

We can say with full responsibility that, first of all, to reduce and control the strategic nuclear weapons with Russia, then President Obama started with the Kremlin the Reset policy because the US president hoped that by warming relations with Russia, along with solving the nuclear problem, the West would be able to solve the situation in Afghanistan, Iran's nuclear program, the creation of an anti-missile shield in Europe, and other global problems.


And 13 years later, Putin is going to play the same card - due to Washington's military assistance to Ukraine, Russia is suspending its participation in this treaty, taking into account the consequences.

 It can be considered, what this "nuclear deal" between the US and Russia represents, which, as the Kremlin suggests, may give serious thought to the White House and the West.

 

Since 1972, this was the seventh treaty that defined the parity of American and Soviet/Russian strategic nuclear weapons and thereby regulated the nuclear confrontation between the two states, as it provided for mutual inspections of strategic facilities, which almost eliminated the secret, combat-ready deployment of uncountable strategic nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles.

By the way, this agreement, which was concluded for 10 years, expired in 2021, but then President Putin himself signed an extension of this agreement for another five years, until February 2026.

 

This treaty stipulates that the United States and the Russian Federation may have in combat readiness (each side) no more than 700 intercontinental ballistic missiles, submarine-launched ballistic missiles, and heavy bombers capable of carrying no more than 1,550 nuclear warheads, as well as combat-ready and no more than 800 missile launchers.

 

This arrangement worked, in principle, because as of September 1, 2020, the US arsenal included 675 strategic nuclear warhead carriers, 1,457 nuclear warheads, and 800 combat-ready and inactive launchers.

 

According to the data of the same year 2020, the strategic nuclear arsenal of the Russian Federation looked like this - 510 units of strategic nuclear warhead carriers, 1,447 nuclear warheads, and 764 combat-ready and non-combat launchers.

 

Russia's announcement of a moratorium on participation in this agreement means that mutual inspections will be stopped and the control mechanism will be completely disrupted. By the way, Putin's regime has already taken some action when it tested an intercontinental ballistic missile. The name of the said missile is SARMAT, which is called Satan II in the West.

 

Based on the above-mentioned factors, it can be said that nuclear militarization may begin at a new increasing pace.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A failed military coup in Russia. What happened?

  A failed military coup in Russia. What happened?   By: Nika Chitadze Director of the Center for International Studies Professor of the International Black Sea University President of the George C. Marshall Alumni Union, Georgia - International and Security Research Center    For several hours on June 24 of this year, Russia was on the verge of a civil war. The rebellious "Wagnerians" were already 200 kilometers from Moscow. In the center of Rostov, the head of "Wagner" Yevgeny Prigozhin himself was fortified, and the Chechen leader Kadyrov sent his armed formations to destroy him, he had positions in the outskirts of the city and was preparing for an attack. However, in the end, the "march of justice" announced by Prigozhin ended "peacefully". Russia avoided a civil war. At least at this point. Government representatives and the so-called parties reached an agreement during the negotiations between the private military company "Wagne

Ukraine's expected counterattack and possible de-occupation of the country

  Ukraine's expected counterattack and Possible De-Occupation of the Country Nika Chitadze Professor of the International Black Sea University Director of the Center for International Studies President of the George C. Marshall Alumni Union, Georgia - International and Security Research Center  As expected, Ukraine's counteroffensive against the Russian occupation forces has already begun, although it has not yet entered the decisive phase. It should be noted that the past 5 months were particularly difficult for Ukrainian soldiers - the period when Ukraine began to save forces to prepare for a large-scale counteroffensive. In recent months, Ukraine has withdrawn most of its combat-ready units from the front line, and thousands of Ukrainian soldiers have gone abroad for training. The newly formed and refreshed brigades were left intact by the military-political leadership of Ukraine and did not involve them in heavy winter battles.   All this happened against the backgrou

Ecologic Problems of the Modern World and their Impact on the International Politics

Nika Chitadze Affiliated Prof. Dr., Faculty of Social Sciences, International Black Sea University. Director of the Center for International Studies President of the George C. Marshall Alumni Union, Georgia – International and Security Research Center Tbilisi, Georgia Introduction Environment and its such resources, as water, air, always were the necessary conditions for the human`s life and activities. But, during the many centuries of the history of mankind, environment was not represented the problem neither for the humanity, nor for its further sustainable development. Environment and natural resources were offering the satisfaction the needs of those people, who lived in the concrete period of the world history without causing the damage to the next generations. At the second half of the XX Century, the topic related to the environmental protection was included to the agenda, including the political aspects, because of the fact, that as a result